ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要類・刊行物等
  2. 広島文化女子短期大学
  3. 広島文化女子短期大学紀要 第3巻

アメリカ法における公立学校と私立学校の性格 : 連邦最高裁の判例をよりどころに

https://doi.org/10.60171/00003395
https://doi.org/10.60171/00003395
d0f42461-27ac-4868-ae5f-337c6e297371
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
3-2.pdf 3-2.pdf (480.2 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2023-03-15
タイトル
タイトル アメリカ法における公立学校と私立学校の性格 : 連邦最高裁の判例をよりどころに
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Characters of Public and Private Schools in American Law
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.60171/00003395
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 上原, 貞雄

× 上原, 貞雄

ja 上原, 貞雄

Search repository
Uehara, Sadao

× Uehara, Sadao

en Uehara, Sadao

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In American law, fundamentally every state has the original power of educational administration to guarantee all the rights relating to education for the children. The state, or the local school districts under the delegation of the power from the state, maintain public schools, and the private corporations maintain private schools based on the corporate charters granted by the state. But, the state's power of educational administration is not almighty. Such power is limited, not to deprive any persons of the rights of liberty and equality by federal judicial precedents in the conformity with the United States Constitution. I think, therefore, that some legal characters of public and private schools can be cleared in the relation between the state's power of educational administration and the individual's rights of education. In this thesis, I deal with the Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Meyer v. Nebraska (1923), and Pierce v. Society of Sisters of Holy Names of Jesus and Christ (1925) as the important federal judicial precedents affecting private schools, or with McCollum v. Board of Education (1948), Zorach v. Clauson (1952), Engel et al. v. Vitale et al. (1962), Wieman v. Updegraff (1952), Adler v. Board of Education (1952), and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) as the similiar judicial precedents affecting public schools. Briefly, private schools are maintained by the private corporations, founding on the individual's rights of liberty in education. The state has the power to interfere private schools to some extent, especially in compulsory grades, but has not the power to prohibit private schools. In the other hand, public schools are maintained by the state or the local school districts for the guaranty of individual's rights of equality of opportunity in education. In addition, the state is not allowed to regulate public schools in the way to invade the individual's rights of liberty.
書誌情報 広島文化女子短期大学紀要

巻 3, p. 5-11, 発行日 1969-08-01
出版者
出版者 広島文化女子短期大学
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09137068
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00213869
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-07-25 11:02:56.790430
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3